Category Archives: Higher Education

Graduations: A Shared Event and Two-Way Invite

Graduations have symbolized an event of change and progression: A farewell to present, a welcome to a bright future. In the midst of the accolades, bravos, and congrats, beyond caps and gowns, speeches and spirits, there appears a missed opportunity—an opportunity that began when the individual and institution first met and continued until commencement day.

The missed opportunity comes in establishing long-term relationships between school and student, faculty and family, institutions and communities.  The typical scenario is that the worthy graduate will reach higher heights and someday return and give back, as an alum, in the form of financial support.  Ironically those who contact alumni, may have never met them while attending. Likewise, the graduate is seen in isolation and not as a social network connected to friends, families, communities, even cultures.

More recent discussions about engagement between educational institutions and learning communities have often ignored the event of graduation as an invitation to reaffirm a lifelong relationship. The best advocates for keeping campuses and communities together are indeed graduates, who represent dual constituencies, or at the least, potential community voices who can speak well on the behalf of their alma mater.

Still an opportunity forgone, if not nurtured and communicated from the start.  Perhaps three significant changes that could happen at graduations: 1) partnering graduates to interested individuals for mutual benefit; 2) providing an ongoing list of projects that graduates could volunteer, consult, or offer expertise inside and outside the institution; and 3) solicit ideas for how graduates’ families, friends, other graduates and students can take part in an institutional and communal agenda.

This is not to say that these actions have not taken place in some small measure, but that graduations are the “best campaign platform” for sustained engagement and relationship-building for future graduates and commencements to come.

Building a Real “Learning City”

A favorite game of mine was “Sim City” (the old version), where as mayor, you get a chance to build a bustling metropolis, full of promise. Very soon you learn a valuable lesson: With good choices come not-so-good outcomes.

Although Sim City was a simulation, one cannot help but wonder how a real city could be built?   For example, Urban Planning and Policy have always formulated plans to build better cities and communities.  But I’ve noticed, often removed from their design, is a blueprint for building ”A Learning City.”

The phrase has gained international appeal that speaks to the economic impact of education in society, where individuals are referred as “human capital” and education depicted as a “product with expected results.”

The learning city that I’m talking about goes a step farther.  A step where K-12 elementary and secondary education as well as college and higher education are not the sole responsibility of educators, but an entire community including parents, families, businesses, organizations, and governments.

Such a city would view individuals as not only human capital, but as many have argued, also social and cultural capital.  Social capital accepts an individual’s diversity and uniqueness, while cultural capital includes a supportive environment that embraces different approaches to education and learning.

In this way, a learning city continues to learn through its citizens, where education and learning is ongoing, continual, and lifelong.  The alternative outcome takes its challenges as learning opportunities to evolve into real-world examples for societies to emulate.

What is Higher Education? A Degree or Something Else

In public discourse, “higher education” is a term that differs from traditional schooling such as elementary, secondary, K-12 education. In America, higher education is often believed to be above and beyond traditional schooling into the academic domain of colleges and universities. Similar terms such as adult & continuing education, vocational training, and lifelong learning are often mentioned among educators, but most people don’t bother to define their differences. In the UK, other terms such as tertiary, permanent, further, and recurrent education add to its complexity.

The trouble in these discussions has less to do with the multiple terms of higher education, and more with the public sentiment. In other words, the way that multiple societies view higher education reveal some deep-seated opinions about the purposes of education and learning.  Opinions bounded by distinctions between required schooling versus optional education.

This leads to the question of whether the sole purpose of higher education is to acquire a college degree? A degree supposedly considered not required nor essential, but only an advancement or enhancement to a high-school diploma and required equivalents.  Also this degree is a form of credential that not only gets you a job, but also provides more opportunities to better careers.

However, current times challenge this typical mindset.  Examples show that a degree does not always transfer to getting a job, and additional credentials are no longer optional, but are seen as paramount to maintaining a career.

Lagging behind the times is the misrepresentation of the term higher education.  Given current circumstances, higher education is an outdated word alluding to a time when more education was an option of leisure. ”Higher” still suggests a “lower,” just as “required schooling” implies ”optional learning,” which colleges and universities used to originally represent.

In the next phase of this public discourse, education is no longer higher and learning is no longer optional.  Such a discussion invites a new mindset willing to remove linkages of trading credentials for better employment.  Instead, there is an acceptance that education and learning is a lifelong public pursuit where talents are discovered, ideas are supported, and vocations are created.

The Best Doctors. Lawyers, and Educators

Apologies if the title implies another top 10 list, since the intention was to comment about what makes the best doctors, lawyers, and educators. I’m honored to see medical doctors practicing in underdeveloped countries, helping the sick, instead of scheduling dates in opulent offices reached by appointment only.

They’re the best doctors: bringing medicine to the sick. Same with lawyers, when they offer legal advice or represent a client ‘for the good’ of the profession and legal system. But what makes the best educators? In the case of medical doctors, how good would they be, if they only cared for the healthy; the same with lawyers, if their only clients were those who knew the law well.

It follows that the best educators are those who provide education to the ones who need it. I caution to say uneducated, because unlike the sick or poorly represented, being uneducated assumes that a ‘fully’ educated exists.

It is probably this point, among others, that distinguishes the three professions. While medical doctors can make us healthier, if a patient dies, the doctor doesn’t die too. If the client is sentenced to jail, the lawyer doesn’t serve the same sentence. But if the learner fails, the educator fails as well.  Not just because of poor practices, doctors and lawyers can do that also, but in preparing learners to become the teachers of educators now and continuing.

In a way, the best educators are investors with a portfolio of healthy, law-abiding, and troubled assets; from grade school to retirement home;  rural and urban, and having scheduled appointments or not.

State of Continuing Education 2012

Presenting the ‘State of Continuing Education’ comes with at least two outdated and conflicting terms. Some changes have occurred, but many have not. We have been hopeful and disappointed, gone through set-backs and have led the way.

We see Education has taken many forms and have been used for different purposes. The challenge going forward will involve defining the education you need among multiple options. Some are costly, many are cheaper, a few are unnecessary, but all of them will teach.

Learning has also come into fashion, which makes it harder to determine its real impact. The shift has turned away from learning individually to learning as a group, with a community, or in a society.

It appears that problems will define what we decide to learn, instead of also curiosity. Although both are needed, the expectations for education and learning to provide solutions and credentials on a timeline, within a budget, for a job and trying to keep one, are trending increasingly higher.

What is getting better and expanding is that education is not just k-12, but throughout a lifetime.  What will be interesting to see is whether adults will capture all of their grade-school experiences, good and bad, and return back to these schools and improve them: Wouldn’t that be continuing education?